Thomas Kuhn and his book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, was a major influence in how we perceive thought formation.  Ideas, beliefs and inventions are dependent on the common disciplinary matrix that it is attached to or overthrowing.  This recognition of the dependence on the structure that permits thought gives rise to the desire to construct new parameters for new ideas. Analogous with Kuhn s contribution was the elaboration of thinkers like Martin Heidegger and the philosophers that followed that opened up the parameters of what constituted value in thinking.  An attention to the dismantling of the old structures began to unfold that would usher in post-modernism.  This term had the apt attribute that evaded a set meaning.  Discursiveness was a key signal feature of this new thinking.  Thinkers such as Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault looked beyond the traditional apparatus and began to construct their own individual structures, sometimes even disavowing their previous inventions and continuing to evolve.  This was a radical break with the previous stable disciplines of before.  The very notion of unfixed structures seemed heretical.  Today they seem prescient. Paraspace follows this line of thought.  Intellectual intuition leads to this use of different changing structures, to a focus on the structures themselves, it creates the space where this new development can take place. Paraspace can also be seen as a time out, a standing back, to reassess the processes that produce ideas. A certain distance can give one a better handle on what is necessary to do.   It is a wholesale reevaluation of the system of thought production.